|
|
Post by watchthis on Dec 1, 2007 23:05:09 GMT -5
This is so fucked up now.
|
|
Maxi
Tampa Bay Rolling Thunder[M:-1000]
Maxi Tevez-Riquelme aka MTR or Maxi pad!!
Posts: 1,846
|
Post by Maxi on Dec 1, 2007 23:13:56 GMT -5
They are totally screwed, there only chance is if Mizzou can pull out a win, because I don't think there's too much question about simply sliding tOSU up to #2. However, if Mizzou indeed loses (like it looks like they will) the BCS is just totally fucked....who do they put there?
By the way, Ohio State vs. Georgia seems like probably the worst National Championship I could have imagined for this season.
|
|
BlackOps
St. Joseph Playboys[/b][M:-1100]
Posts: 3,520
|
Post by BlackOps on Dec 1, 2007 23:16:40 GMT -5
Ohio State!  The only good thing all week. |
|
Eielson
Hall of Famer[/i]
I love Coldplay and hairy sacks[/color][M:-7450]
I have tourettes
Posts: 9,884
|
Post by Eielson on Dec 2, 2007 1:50:17 GMT -5
Any system would be fucked.
|
|
MiniHusk
Roseville Bunnies[M:-6550]
Yetis4Lyfe
Posts: 5,811
|
Post by MiniHusk on Dec 2, 2007 3:45:43 GMT -5
OSU vs LSU is the common pick
|
|
|
|
Post by jellyman on Dec 2, 2007 9:12:25 GMT -5
WE NEED A FUCKING PLAYOFF SYSTEM. So what if West Virginia lost to one of the worst teams in their conference? They should still play in the championship. But, yeah, a 32 or 64 team playoff system wouldn't kill nobody, even if it means that some of the best teams would have to play more than half the games in the system they played in the regular season. |
|
Eielson
Hall of Famer[/i]
I love Coldplay and hairy sacks[/color][M:-7450]
I have tourettes
Posts: 9,884
|
Post by Eielson on Dec 2, 2007 11:16:31 GMT -5
But, yeah, a 32 or 64 team playoff system wouldn't kill nobody. That would be dumb as hell. |
|
|
|
Post by I Make Plays..... 14 on Dec 2, 2007 11:16:59 GMT -5
You cant have 32 gaems , let alone 64. that is crazy this isnt baskebtall. 16 games max.
|
|
BlackOps
St. Joseph Playboys[/b][M:-1100]
Posts: 3,520
|
Post by BlackOps on Dec 2, 2007 11:38:43 GMT -5
8 teams should be in it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Marcus Mudkip on Dec 2, 2007 12:02:05 GMT -5
It's simple, do 8 teams....
Gator Bowl
Capital One Bowl
Fiesta Bowl
Sugar Bowl
Round Two:
Orange Bowl
Rose Bowl
Round 3:
BCS National Championship
You lose none of the sponsors and teams have to play 2 more games than regular max
|
|
Eielson
Hall of Famer[/i]
I love Coldplay and hairy sacks[/color][M:-7450]
I have tourettes
Posts: 9,884
|
Post by Eielson on Dec 2, 2007 12:36:52 GMT -5
Four teams would be the only thing to improve what we already have. Even then, you'd have to get the teams right...which wouldn't happen. You'll find a way to complain about somethign no matter the system.
One more thing to think about. When do people pay attention to college basketball? March Madness. The regular season doesn't really matter. Everybody pays attention to the regular season in football...wanna take that away? IT'S FINE THE WAY IT IS!
|
|
|
|
Post by motown1391 on Dec 2, 2007 12:39:49 GMT -5
The only thing I have against that is that in CFB more than any other sport it is based on prestige. If USC is say 11-2 or so and then Hawaii is 13-0.... most people would pick USC to play... do we really know they're better? No. We just assume they are because they have more hyped athletes and play in a bigger conference
|
|
|
|
Post by Andrew Styles on Dec 2, 2007 12:54:47 GMT -5
I hated the BCS system as it was anyway. I knew something like this was going to happen and I was just waiting for it. Haha.
|
|
Brunxa
MVP[/i]
[M:0]
I'm taking my ball and going home. I QUIT!
Posts: 1,258 
|
Post by Brunxa on Dec 2, 2007 13:13:13 GMT -5
The only thing I have against that is that in CFB more than any other sport it is based on prestige. If USC is say 11-2 or so and then Hawaii is 13-0.... most people would pick USC to play... do we really know they're better? No. We just assume they are because they have more hyped athletes and play in a bigger conference This is the beauty of CFB. It's all about the controversy. That's why we come back for more every year. It's also a safe assumption that USC is a better team than Hawaii because they put better/more athletes into the NFL than Hawaii does. This is why an OSU, a USC, heck...even a Georgia is likely to get much stronger consideration than Hawaii. As for NAT CHAMPS, OSU vs USC. You've got to love the backdoor championship that's been created this year. The consistent inconsistency has made for a spectacular finish! |
|
Eielson
Hall of Famer[/i]
I love Coldplay and hairy sacks[/color][M:-7450]
I have tourettes
Posts: 9,884
|
Post by Eielson on Dec 2, 2007 14:34:46 GMT -5
In that Sagaran Poll (part of the computer polls), it has Oklahoma ahead of Ohio State. |
|
